Icing -
Measurable Sleet with Freezing Rain Category
·
Consists chiefly
of measurable sleet events, most often mixed w/freezing rain during the 6 hour
forecast period.
·
86% of the total events produced measurable
sleet.
o
86% of the measurable sleet events mixed
w/freezing rain
o
7% mixed w/snow
o
7% were all sleet
o
14% of the total events were all snow
o
14 total events
Due to the
close proximity of the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico, an established
inversion with a significant melting layer is prone to be maintained. This in
part may explain the tendency for measurable sleet in Central North Carolina to
be associated with freezing rain
Principal forecast issues
- Liquid
equivalent to sleet ratio
- Erosion
of a sleet producing melting layer, supporting snow at the expense of
sleet
- If due
to melting, evaluate soundings for presence of a near freezing isothermal
layer. More likely to occur when the thickness values in the 850/700 mb
layer are in the 1550-57 range.
- If due
to cold air advection, note trends in the 850/700 mb partial thickness
values.
- A max
temperature in the melting layer < 1 C supports snow while
temperatures > 1 C and < 3 C support a snow/sleet mix to sleet
event. Check soundings.
- Anticipating
strong low level thermal advection.
- TREND
data base shows several events where the partial thickness values were only
marginally in support of measurable sleet. These events trended quickly
toward colder low level thickness values likely due to cold air damming.
- Anticipating
prolonged sleet events
- Influence
of elevated convection – ice seeding aloft
- Influence
of in-cloud temperatures colder than -10 C in the 1000/850 mb layer
- Influence
of an occluding inland low (Miller “B” cyclogenesis) - limiting warm air
advection
Vertical temperature
profiles associated with the measurable sleet w/freezing rain category
- Prominent
subfreezing cold nose (<1280) beneath a prominent melting warm nose (
> 1560)
o
characterized 25%
of the soundings
- Small
subfreezing low level cold nose (~1290) beneath a prominent melting warm
nose ( >1560)
o
33% of the
soundings
o
these events
were trending toward colder low level partials during the 6 hour forecast
period likely due to cold air damming.
- Potential
for mid level near freezing isothermal segments (850/700 mb thickness
values in the 1550s)
o
21% of the
soundings
o
850/700 mb thickness
values in the 1550s in this predominant p-type category can be
associated with near freezing isothermal segments
o
when near
freezing isothermal, then any melting layer aloft is very small and would lead
to snow falling at the expense of sleet.
Prolonged Sleet -
Tentative Findings
- Liquid
equivalent to sleet ratios - a limited number of “largely to all sleet” cases
suggest a liquid equivalent to sleet ratio of 1:2-3 inches.
- The
prolonged sleet storm of Feb 16-17 1987 (6.5” RAH, 2” GSO) was a rare
event.
- The sleet
may have been prolonged due in part to a max cold nose temperature colder
than – 10 C in the 1000/850 mb layer, providing an ongoing ice seeding
mechanism.
- The rare
prolonged sleet event was also associated with elevated convection,
producing ice seeding through a deep layer aloft.
- Partial
thickness values <1275 in the 1000/850 mb layer, minimum temperatures
colder than -10 C in this layer and/or the presence of elevated convection
alerts the forecaster to the potential of prolonged sleet
- Miller
“B” – Rare
prolonged sleet events can be associated with Miller “B” cyclogenesis where
the inland surface low is without warm advection due to occlusion and
there is also strong cold air advection.
Footnotes
- The
“measurable sleet with freezing rain” category is defined on the
predominant p-type nomogram by the partial thickness values of 1260/1562 –
1282/1550 – 1293/1550 – 1290/1580
- Events
where evaporative cooling in dry layers aloft produce a brief period of
sleet that reaches the ground with surface temperatures well above
freezing do not occur in this predominant p-type quadrant. Furthermore,
since TREND is designed to specify predominant p-type based upon potential
impact, it does not include nuisance (i.e. no impact) sleet events in its
data base.